The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep for now and the article probably needs a major rewrite in order to keep up with our WP:MOS. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 05:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PrefixNE[edit]

PrefixNE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete advertising for NN company Mayalld (talk) 16:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- I believe the two reviews in the external links section establish notability per our guideline. --A. B. ^(talk) 16:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- A. B. ^(talk) 16:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Again,

I'm the creator of the Article. Fairly new to Wikipedia, I must say that I'm a bit confused with all of this, but I still know, this Article is not an hidden advertisment.

This is a well known product, with hundreds of users world-wide. you can Google it, and you will find hundreds of reviews and talks in forums about this. I barely wrote anything about the product, non the less, any hidden or revealed advertising.

I'd be happy if you can mention specifically, what is wrong with my post, I'm more then comfortable with changing or editing it so it will be as objective as possible.

Thank you,

- Nathan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathan1982 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 28 January 2008

• Very weak keep. Reviews do prove notability (barely), but the article needs to be written so a not to be a simple feature list and screen shots. This would fail WP:SPAM were it not for the reviews. A package used by "hundreds worldwide" (as stated above) may have a hard time being notable. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.