The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The title Prem Khan is already salted. I will salt Prem Khan (actor) as well, due to multiple deletions and recreations of articles about this person. MelanieN (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prem Khan (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't seem to have met notability criteria for an actor. The only sources that have talked about him are his website and IMDb. Other sources are completely irrelevant and looks like they were added for the count. Fails WP:GNG. —UY Scuti ^Talk 13:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

User Washim Rehman is the same person about whom this article is about.

Refer [[1]] for details -

The article was first created by the name 'Prem Khan' & was marked for deletion (26 September 2015).

The article was recreated second time by the same name 'Prem Khan' & was marked for deletion (16 November 2015).

The article was recreated third time by the name 'Prem Khan (actor)' & was marked for deletion by me (05 January 2016).

The user Washim Rehman was blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing so he created a new user Devil7592686.love

The article is now recreated the fourth time by the name 'Prem Khan (actor)' & is now marked for deletion (06 January 2016).

- Ninney (talk) 13:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 14:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 14:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG. -KH-1 (talk) 03:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not yet a solidly acceptable article and not enough solid in-depth third-party sources overall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister (talk • contribs) 06:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)‎[reply]
Delete - Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass WP:GNG, and they clearly don't pass WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.