The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PrepInsta[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable business, sources cited are all pure churnalism, and a search finds nothing better. Was moved into the main space past AfC. Speedy request was removed without explanation, so here we are at AfD. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Internet, and India. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

Strong Keep : Page only discusses facts like inception year, business model, team, websites and content obtained from PrepInsta's own website and reputed news articles. Given the topic has been well indepth research about the subject. Regarding notability, the product/website as per similarweb is used by millions everymonth. WikiMann123 (talk) 11:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : I found this article to notable enough to be featured on wikipedia. Please do not make wikipedia an information only about the west (US/Europe). In the context of the company which is based out of India. The company is notable enough and adds value to wikipedia covering information in an unbiased geographical representation of information and keeping wikipedia a source for global information Connan.d (talk) 12:00, 4 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep : I believe that page should be kept. The business is notable and used by millions in India and well covered in articles. About churnalism, I have provided some skeleton information about the company. I believe the page information can be expand further by other collaborators on wikipedia to make it better. However, I completely disagree with DoubleGrazing, who only writes about articles about Finland and its people. Will obviously have very little context about Indian Subcontinent and its businesses. As said by Connan.d wikipedia should be more about global information and representation. This article is a keep. Wishie123 (talk) 12:12, 4 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the obvious SPAs are uncompelling in their arguments. This fails NCORP/NORG by a mile. It's all cruft/press releases and otherwise not in depth coverage. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep : Corporation seems notable and the article can be expanded further by more contributors in future. Sebkaushik (talk) 12:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources are basically press releases. Article is one big WP:PROMO. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obvious spam page published by a SPA. press-releases don't make a company notable at all. --Morpho achilles (talk) 08:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article supported by start-up announcement coverage and latterly with text content and interview coverage regarding their subscription proposition. No evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:04, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam published by an SPA HighKing⁺⁺ 21:06, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Sources are press releases fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.