The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

President fiction

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that the genre is notable (in the sense of WP:GNG). The article is vague, unreferenced and full of original research. Pichpich (talk) 23:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 07:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 07:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 07:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Hard to tell if there’s a notable topic in there, with no refs, links, or concrete examples. Searching with a variety of search terms turns up nothing. Normally would try searching in Chinese which would I suspect be far more fruitful but none is given.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 08:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lepricavark (talk) 00:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Searches turn up nothing and as it is written now it should not be included in the encyclopedia. I'm aware AfD is not cleanup, but when we can't ascertain if it is a notable term, it should be deleted. Would be open to keeping if there are Chinese-language sources that show it is notable. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There are no sources provided by the article; there are also no sources that can be found regarding the topic. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 00:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Romance novel as effectively a generic romance novel trope. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 17:50, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to merge though. I mean Romance novel is a properly written, properly sourced article. I doubt adding any of this badly written and unsourced content would improve it or be welcomed. Taiwanese literature might be more appropriate target, except for the same issues with this content. I looked at Taiwanese literature to see if mentioned "President fiction" when trying to find references to it, but there’s nothing on that or any Taiwan-specific romance genre.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 18:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.