The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Progress Rail. plicit 10:48, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress Rail GT38CU-3[edit]

Progress Rail GT38CU-3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searching online for this train, I'm unable to find any significant coverage of this model outside of Wikipedia itself (if you can call this stub significant coverage). I'd expect coverage to be online, since the article says the train only has been built since 2019. As a result, this fails WP:GNG. Per WP:NPRODUCT, I propose that this article be redirected to Progress Rail, which appears to be the company most closely associated with this product, if there is a source that can be used to verify that this model of locomotive actually exists. If such a source cannot be found, deletion would be appropriate. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:14, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 03:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.