The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prophecies of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:DEL6, WP:DEL7, and WP:DEL8 as essentially all sources citing the propecies are non-scholarly pro-Ahmadiyya sites and therefore, unreliable. – Batreeq ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 02:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 23:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Selective Merge to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Serious POV concerns with the current article, in addition to the nom's concerns. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:03, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - If someone really wants to work on an article then they should instead start from scratch than using this POV cruft. Rzvas (talk) 18:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - "said to have" been synthesis and trivia. As Rzvas predicted, start from scratch. Bearian (talk) 00:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.