The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted WP:G12. (non-admin closure) Ceethekreator (talk) 21:54, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Protegent 360

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references given; seems to be original research. I don't find coverage in reliable sources. —teb728 t c 18:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks the multiple reliable independent secondary sources required by WP:GNG to establish notability, Matter of fact, it has no sources whatsoever. Nor was I able to find any suitable sources by searching. The entire article appears to have been plagiarized from [1]. Msnicki (talk) 23:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.