- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) PureRED | talk to me | 16:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Pure Insurance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Organization does not appear to meet WP:ORG. The organization does sponsor a golf tournament that has some coverage, but there is little coverage of the organization itself. PureRED | talk to me | 19:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is editor "Pure Red" somehow related to this company? In any case, the article is a stub, one I hope will grow in time. The firm seems to be one of those secretive companies that serves only the very rich. I suspect it is useful and important to throw light on them. ''Paul, in Saudi'' (talk) 01:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not in any way connected to this organization or even this industry
; further, if I were, why would I nominate the article for deletion? That's a very bizarre question. Oh, I get it. My username. No, I've been on Wikipedia for far longer than this organization has existed. PureRED | talk to me | 03:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- (This is where I would click the "I have read your message" button if we had one.) I was imagining someone from the company might want to suppress any information about it. In any case, what say we let this sit for a month or so to see if anyone can or will add to it? ''Paul, in Saudi'' (talk) 04:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't hurt. I'll withdraw. PureRED | talk to me | 16:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.