The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

QC Reporting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No Google hits on the first three pages. Web site for the product is 404. No sources cited in article. Reads as product brochure/advertising/howto. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No evidence of notability. PianoDan (talk) 00:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete Not notable, and software may not exist now.--DThomsen8 (talk) 02:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.