The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation herein.) North America1000 06:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Qin Junjie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded with the rationale: "easily passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR and a 10-year career makes it hardly WP:TOOSOON". And the other editor is correct, it is not a case of WP:TOOSOON, I was attempting to give the benefit of the doubt. The actor has had a single significant role, in Noble Aspirations. That's it. Every other role is not that significant. The one other exception would have been The Legend of Qin, but he didn't appear in that film, he was voiceover talent for the animated production. Onel5969 TT me 02:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL) 37900 Gnews results in Chinese
Comment: I don't think 37,900 is correct. I am getting exactly 298 right now. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 04:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ghits are unreliable, but the point is he's popular and likely meets WP:NACTOR: "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following." Timmyshin (talk) 05:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.