The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. joe deckertalk to me 05:36, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Qiulin Zhang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article claims an impressive resume, but a Google search ([1]) doesn't suggest the same kind of notability as the article claims, and in fact, I think, shows insufficient notability. The puffery suggests self-advertisement. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Tom Morris (talk) 18:13, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Michaela den (talk) 11:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.