The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep and also note the withdrawn (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RVD (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination has been withdrawn It seems that this does not pass WP:TWODABS because Rob Van Dam is considered as primary topic while Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst, the Netherlands Government information Service, is not. Is it considered to retain and move RVD (disambiguation) to RVD as 2-dab page or delete and change the hatnote for RVD. You judge on that. j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 18:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the link to Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia should be restored per WP:Don't be a dick. Siuenti (talk) 21:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I dug up another entry two more entries, so there are now four five. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Just keep those entries added for possible RVD. Let's see if Rob Van Dam is still a primary topic or not. j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 04:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, valid dab page. Possibly debate whether the wrestler is or is not the Primary topic. PamD 08:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep valid dab page with several entries. Boleyn (talk) 18:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There's no problem if this will be kept since more entries are added to that disambiguation page. Let's see if this will be closed. j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 18:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 3oWh pF0wHz, would you consider withdrawing your nomination? Then it can be closed without waiting for a week. Boleyn (talk) 15:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Boleyn Well, let's close this one instead since Siuenti and Clarityfiend added the possible entry for RVD. When I post for the deletion, only two dabs are shown, namely Rob Van Dam and Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst. When the other possible entries are added by those two users, it seems more users are unanimously agreed to keep the dab page instead. So there's no doubt that this dab is valid. j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 07:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.