The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article demonstrates the reason why wikipedia WP:NPOV applies to article titles not just content.
To accept the premise of the stand alone article of this title is WP:UNDUE it completely loses the scientific context of the number of world class institutions who do not consider this to be an area meritting study
The context of this contraversial issue has been completely lost from the creator's comment "copied large section from Racism"
The article is purely about IQ and not intelligence and there is a difference. Which means it is already misnamed. The information needs to be put in scientific context ie what effects an IQ test [1] to name one of many. Someone's genetic code is complex as are how things are passed on. If this subject is viewed as notable then it should appear under its closest scientific field Heritability of IQ or in a social context such as Scientific racism
Because NPOV arguments are so rarely needed on deletion I will give a short example just because there are news articles about World war II bomber found on the Moon [2] doesn't mean that the context should be ignored and an article written as if the story was believed to be true. It has nothing to do with notability.
Both Race and Intelligence and Race and IQ should be deleted WP:PSCI; WP:FRINGE; WP:NPOV; WP:UNDUE; not redirected and the content placed on Heritability of IQ as a subsection towards the end, a great deal of clean-up is still needed after the move as the article currently stands it is in breech of WP:Propaganda. Tetron76 (talk) 16:55, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
An idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea,[3] and reliable sources must be cited that affirm the relationship of the marginal idea to the mainstream idea in a serious and substantial manner.
KEEP but work on it and perhaps re-title it. I think the general areas of intelligence and its definition, (supposed) measurement by conventional IQ tests, the results of such tests as they correlate with economic status individually and by country, performance changes over time for individuals and groups, correlations with school success and job success, the proposed linkage of such test results to the ill-defined category of race, and the political and social policy conclusions some draw from the test results needs to be carefully discussed. The reasons that many people hold false stereotypes and draw illogical conclusions about these issues also ought to be examined, though that bleeds over into psychology, sociology and politics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.185.175.10 (talk) 19:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]