The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close, nominator has been blocked indefintely as a single purpose account bent on deleting this page for no valid reason. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 00:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Railpage Australia[edit]

Railpage Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Blatant commercial advertising, trivia, random unreliable sources that just mention the site and original research from primary sources. Previous AfD was rejected in favor of cleanup but no attempt at cleanup has been made. Tezza2 23:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per 6th discussion.--JForget 00:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note. I speedy closed this as a bad faith nom, but the nominator undid it. I plan to speedy close this again, as I've asked the nom to take it to WP:DRV if they have a problem. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 00:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The issue is for DISCUSSION, not non-admin closure. The nom is valid. No attempt has been made at cleanup. Tezza2 00:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.