The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rami Ghandour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. This article seems to exist solely to promote Ghandour's "NRTCA" product and ForestWeb company. Google searches (once one removes references to a different Rami Ghandour who is CEO of an outfit called Metito) result in only press releases and minor coverage. No indications of any significant coverage. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Delete All of the references are either press releases or other non-independent sources, barely mention him, or don't mention him at all. The article is heavily promotional in tone. The article has been created, recreated after an earlier deletion, and mainly edited by a group of single purpose accounts and single purpose IPs whose only purpose seems to be promotion of Forestweb and Industry Intelligence Inc, and this article is spam on a subject with no evidence of notability, either in the article or anywhere else. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Press releases and being quoted in some press articles is not sufficient indication of notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:52, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.