The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, despite the purdy picture. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:55, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from speedy deletion - seems non-notable but does turn up some Google hits. SCEhardT 02:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Teh delete. NN. BD2412 T 02:47, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --King of Hearts 03:47, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Google hits have me believing this is a viable internet meme. And in the end days, we'll all be caught up in the raptor rapture.... —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete upon more detailed investigation. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 16:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a "viable internet meme" with all of 161 unique hits. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:59, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Memecruft. Yes, I keep inventing new crufts. This is not a popular meme on the scale of O RLY or even Brian Peppers. FCYTravis 05:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Zoe and FCYTravis; not a notable meme. --Muchness 12:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep notable internet memes. --badlydrawnjeff 14:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • I asume by that statement that you mean that you don't care if this one is deleted, since it isn't a notable internet meme? Zoe (216.234.130.130 16:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]
    • Nope. I meant keep, as I believe this is a notable internet meme. There's no need to twist what I'm saying, thanks. --badlydrawnjeff 16:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
      • How does 161 hits makes something notable? Zoe (216.234.130.130 17:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]
        • I get 987 for '"raptor jesus" -wiki.' It's more than notable enough for me. --badlydrawnjeff 18:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
          • I get 968 using your search, but of those, only 150 are unique, which means the multiple occurrences are happening on the same site(s). Zoe (216.234.130.130 19:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]
            • And that doesn't change my belief that this is a notable meme. --badlydrawnjeff 19:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
              • If your standards of "notability" are that low, what WOULD you delete as a non-notable Internet meme? By comparison, "O RLY" -wiki has 194,000 Googles, and "Brian Peppers' - wiki has 70,100 Googles. 987 is... Pathetic. That's not a meme. That's something someone made up in school one day. FCYTravis 22:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. That picture is awesome. -- MisterHand 17:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your voting keep just because the picture is awesome? --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable. Edgar181 18:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• No vote, but there is a much more detailed Raptor Jesus article available at Encyclopedia Dramatica. Hall Monitor 20:03, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Internet memes are their raison d'etre. Just because there is an article there is no indication that we should have one here. Zoe (216.234.130.130 22:07, 22 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]
• Delete- yes, the picture is awesome but non-notable internet memes do not belong on Wikipedia. Reyk 00:03, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please it is a notable meme. Yuckfoo 00:18, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete There seems to be alot of nn internet cruft lately. karmafist 23:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable Cruft --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep notable internet meme

-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.243.174.31 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 24 December 2005

• Teh Keep its quite roxorz

-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.89.249 (talk • contribs) 02:22, 25 December 2005

• Delete. Having 150 unique hits doesn't raise this to the level of in-joke, let alone meme. --Calton | Talk 00:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.