The result was keep. John254 00:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable charity. No reliable sources cited. Some of the page appears to have come from an account with a conflict of interest. Prod removed by page creator without comment, article has stood with a ((notability)) tag for over a week. J Milburn (talk) 13:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I created this article when I saw the organisation mentioned in the Torture article. I had not heard of them before but referenced their aims and details from their website which is given as a link. I have no conflict of interest, although they may have subsequently edited the article, most of these have been reverted. I cannot see the problem - regarding notability- they are supported by the UN, Oxfam and other emininent bodies and undertake extensive casework regarding torture survivors and are invoved with sponsoring a parliamentary bill. Many torture survivors would be interested in such a service which is not, to my knowledge provided elsewhere , especially not by the British Government, which supports the rioght of Saudi Arabia to torture its citizens even when innocent- see reference from
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/torture-britons-lose-bid-to-sue-saudis-482372.html --Streona (talk) 08:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]