The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Rule of Ming and Zhang. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:38, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resurgence of Guangwu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a neologism, or at least very uncommon term. A quoted search for both Resurgence of Guangwu and Guangwu Resurgence came back with minimal results, very few of which used such terminology. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 01:06, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Probably not a neologism in Chinese if the source of Hou Han Shu (now wikilinked at the article) is correct. I too am not really seeing many hits in English for this phrase. If it is kept as a redirect, redirecting to Han_dynasty#Eastern_Han might make sense, as where I do see it, it seems to refer to more than the reign of Guangwu alone, more of, to use westernized metaphors, an Eastern Han golden age or renaissance. 24.151.116.12 (talk) 17:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Redirect to the (equally poorly sourced) article on the Rule of Ming and Zhang. It is stated that the term "Resurgence of Guangwu" is used interchangeably with "Rule of Ming and Zhang", anyway. -The Gnome (talk) 10:14, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Just redirect -- This placeholder is no more than a definition. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - useless unsourced one-sentence stub. -Zanhe (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.