Rimbun Air de Havilland DHC-6 Twin Otter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a significant, noteworthy aircrash. The guidance at WP:AIRCRASH suggests this should be an entry in a larger list, nothing more. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Indonesia. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Aviation. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Event fails WP:GNG and the event criteria. No evidence of lasting effects with no continued coverage of the accident. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 09:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: In the future, it would be better if you cited something else than WP:AIRCRASH as it is an essay and should not be applied in AfD nominations.

Per the consensus from the page:

By consensus this should not be used to determine whether a stand-alone article should exist or not. If an accident or incident meets the criteria for inclusion in an airport, airline or aircraft article it may also be notable enough for a stand-alone article, if it also meets the criteria provided by the general notability guideline, a notability of events guideline and a guide on the use of news reports.

Because this is an essay and not policy and also because it should not be applied to stand-alone accident articles, it is recommended that it not be cited at Articles for Deletion discussions for either keeping or deleting. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 09:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]