The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Romantic Blue

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, ~~I can find no evidence of notability for this film.~~ Changing to keep per MichaelQSchmidt, with some chagrin - that's something I should have found before nominating. Tazerdadog (talk) 01:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC) (Updated Tazerdadog (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see any coverage in reliable sources—although this could be a case of not being able to search for Thai-language sources. Film fails WP:GNG and thus also fails the notability guidelines for films. —C.Fred (talk) 01:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. C.Fred and talk show some respect. This film is 21 years old and was popular at their time. Better to fix the article not remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neo Asian 2010s (talk • contribs) 02:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thai:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

year/type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep Since it won a Thailand National Film Association Awards for Best Picture in 1996, we have a reasonable assertion of notability to meet WP:NF and no need to delete for lacking English language coverage. Instead we let the stub remain and dig deeper for Thai sources under its original title, and ask for input from Thai Wikipedians. . Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'll go with that. Winning a country's top film honour, as this does seem to have done, would meet WP:NFO. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has won a top award passes WP:NFILM Atlantic306 (talk) 02:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep According to IMDB trivia, it's also top box office in Thailand for the year 1995 [1]. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 06:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the reasons already stated above. Aoba47 (talk) 22:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.