The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. I've created a redirect from Marco Horácio, with no objection to swapping the two over if anyone thinks that's better.  —SMALLJIM  22:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Rouxinol Faduncho (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominate for deletion Can find nothing on Ghits or article to support notability. Boleyn (talk) 19:05, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rouxinol Faduncho is a character portrayed by one of the most famous mainstream comedians of Portugal and is a satire on modern Portuguese culture mixed with older culture, of which fado is an important part. Wikipedia has an article about every single American football player in existence, I think it can afford to have one about Rouxinol.--Midasminus (talk) 21:28, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 'One of the most famous mainstream comedians of Portugal' - yet he doesn't have his own article? What part of WP:NOTABILITY does this character meet? Boleyn (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 00:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- In Portuguese WP, the Rouxinol Faduncho article is merged as a section within the actor's article.
- A redirect for "Rouxinol Faduncho" is created to point to the new section.
- The merged article is built up and references added that evidence notability.
- A translated copy of the merged article is created in English WP.
- Ideally, all of this is completed in the next few days, so that this AfD is rendered moot. :)
--Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:33, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 03:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.