The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:40, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhez Amrelia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD; the article is effectively unreferenced now that the Financial Express advertorial has been removed. I could not find even one WP:RS showing WP:SIGCOV, therefore WP:GNG does not appear to be met. Some may argue that the subscriber count or view count makes him notable but there is clear consensus at WP:NYOUTUBE that this is not sufficient when the YouTuber hasn't received any significant coverage from independent sources. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Non notable YouTuber with no third party coverage. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No evidence of significance and fails GNG. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 01:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: There is enough evidence about this tech youtuber. Three legitimate references are given in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:10B:D63A:356F:9E74:5ECB:B328 (talk) 08:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: This article is about a famous tech blogger based upon 7 references. This article should'nt be removed from Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluespidey2k (talk • contribs) 08:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appearing on 'top 10 tech YouTubers' in some blogs is not sufficient as they do not meet our WP:RS criteria or WP:SIGCOV Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no coverage. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 09:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fails WP:BASIC. No significant coverage defcon5 (talk) 07:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page is about a famous tech youtuber and deleting it makes no sense. This page should remain on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:10B:D63A:356F:9E74:5ECB:B328 (talk) 08:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.