The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clearly this guy is a subject of sustained media interest. Whether he really has made waves in the boxing world, a question raised by several delete votes, is not for us to judge. Shii (tock) 03:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Martin (boxer)[edit]

Ryan Martin (boxer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisting per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 January 6. This article was deleted in a Afd, but a review was requested. The outcome of that review was to relist the article for a fresh AfD. I am listing this as an administrative action only, and offer no opinion on the outcome.-- RoySmith (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:14, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:14, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:14, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:14, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do you feel there is a problem with "The Ring" as a source? It clearly isn't local and it's exactly the publication one would hope to see a boxer in. Hobit (talk) 11:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The monthly British magazine SportsPro is another non-local source about the subject. Link to the article, which I've added to my list of sources above. Cunard (talk) 18:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
except since as was argued first time round, #4 is widely recognised not to include junior competitions. So you are probably going to have to give people a bit more to work with here than a vague wave at a guideline. What is the competition that you think qualifies? Is it junior or senior? Is there any precedent for this? --nonsense ferret 12:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will gather additional sources other than local coverage for your review. C.dunkin (talk) 02:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If he's "clearly heavily promoted" isn't that part of the point we are discussing WP:GNG ? This shouldn’t be a case of WP:TOOSOON due to the many reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Many people from various media outlets/platforms have followed and documented the success/failures and stories of his young lifelong commitment to his sport.C.dunkin (talk) 02:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. "RYAN MARTIN STANDS OUT FROM SEA OF PROSPECTS". fighthype.com. Luis Sandoval. Retrieved 16 January 2015.

    The article notes:

    There is always a large sea of prospects in boxing, but there are those that stand out and separate themselves from the pack. Lightweight Ryan Martin (10-0, 6Kos) has been doing just that. The Chattanooga, TN native has been making noise in his 16 months as a professional and has been looking very impressive. Martin is currently signed to rapper and businessman 50 Cent's SMS Promotions. Although 2014 saw many fighters sitting on the sidelines waiting for a fight date, Martin was in the ring 8 times in 12 months. He fought on ESPN and major network undercards, including HBO and Showtime. Keeping busy and continuing to learn is top priority for Martin.Like most can't miss prospects, Martin seems to have the full package so far as a young professional. He's very talented, athletic, has fast hands, a precession-like jab and puts his punches together well. Ryan also has a decorated amateur career, which includes over 200 amateur wins and numerous National Championships and international experience.

  2. "50 CENTS SMS PROMOTION SCORES WIN WITH RYAN MARTIN". www.hiphopmyway.com. Lucy Alvarez. Retrieved 9 April 2014.

    The article notes:

    Ryan Martin may arguably be the promotion’s flagship talent at the moment, with a push for champ in the works. Ryan Martin signed with the promotion in late 2013 and most recently took down Justin Robbins at the Chatman – Brewer fight on March 28th with a stunning second round knockout, bringing his record to 4-0 with three knockouts. An impressive step in a promising career.

  3. "RYAN MARTIN GAINING EXPERIENCE WITH YURIORKIS GAMBOA". boxingtalk.com. Doveed Linder. Retrieved 23 May 2015.

    The article notes:

    In this interview, lightweight Ryan Martin (5-0, 3 KOs) discusses sparring with Yuriorkis Gamboa, meeting Mike Tyson for the first time, and his plans for the future.

  4. "TALKING BOXING WITH ROSIE PEREZ". athleteoriginals.com. Chris Dey. Retrieved 17 October 2014.

    The article notes: Walking through New York City on Wednesday and just happened to meet up with Rosie Perez on 45th & 9th as she was waiting for a cab. Now I had never met Rosie, but I felt like I knew Rosie…at least well enough to say hi. Because we have a common friend in Ryan ‘Blue Chip‘ Martin. Rosie is a big boxing fan and she’s been at a couple of Ryan’s fights since he turned pro last year. Now for those of you who don’t know Ryan yet…he’s special. It’s always fun to draw comparisons to past greats, but perhaps in Ryan’s case it’s best to just let him ‘tell his own story’

  5. ,C.dunkin (talk) 02:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear at all that these sources contribute much at all to the case for notability, I have concerns about the significance, independence and reliability of these - one in particular seems to be from a company that is selling merchandise on the boxer's behalf. --nonsense ferret 22:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
People reading and editing this page can check that this information comes from many non-self published reliable sources. Subject page has no original research and all information is verifiable. There's a plethora of sources from top boxing websites, magazines, newspapers, and other web-like organizations addressing the subject directly and in detail. The one source you question can be used for additional information because the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim. However, we know the article is certainly not based primarily on such source. I only mentioned it in this discussion. C.dunkin (talk) 02:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.

— General notability guideline
C.dunkin (talk) 02:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.