The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Prolog. Sandstein 18:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SICStus Prolog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It has no contents; just an infobox, a further reading section and a couple of footnotes for the infobox. It is rather a crowded page, for all its lack of useful readable material. Codename Lisa (talk) 07:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 09:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The rationale does not appear to be presenting a case for deletion, only a case for article expansion through normal editing? AllyD (talk) 08:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wrong. Not having any content is a criterion for speedy deletion. Of course, if you feel obliged to undertake the laborious task of writing an actual article for the topic of that contentless page, I recommend you to have it deleted first, so that the act of creating is logged in your name. You know, just in case you wanted to nominate for something after twelve years of service here. —Codename Lisa (talk) 09:48, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or merge into Prolog article. If this is the best editors can present after 5 years, it is unlikely to qualify as notable.--Rpclod (talk) 14:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and Redirect to Prolog. The Prolog language is notable, individual compilers rarely so, and frankly they're generally not terribly distinctive (though microProlog had its own variant syntax). At most someone might make a list of the compilers, each one cited, but it's a hiding to nothing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I love AfD. Recently, it has become the only place in which people offer compromises, like what's happening above. —Codename Lisa (talk) 07:54, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Prolog, where it is mentioned, and redirect seems like a good way to WP:PRESERVE the information. Sam Sailor 09:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.