The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SMYLONYLON (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source #1 is trivial, other three sources are trivial. Very few hits on Google and Gnews. Last AFD was no consensus. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- Not notable. Epass (talk) 02:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The 1995 New York Times article does not support most of the content. The other sources are blogs and therefore aren't reliable sources. Multiple independent sources are needed to establish notability of this defunct used clothing store, and they are lacking. Cullen328 (talk) 08:19, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.