The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen (talk) 01:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SPDR Gold Shares

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be merely advertisement. There is little content on the page except for a "See also:" Veriss (talk) 09:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted to original redirect. Not enough information to support separate article created by anon. Nirvana2013 (talk) 09:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have reverted the redirect. The AFD has not closed with a concensus to redirect. -- Whpq (talk) 15:38, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This WSJ article is the most substantial writeup I can find. It's mostly mentions in articles about the gold market or other metal markets. What is the case for making this a redirect? -- Whpq (talk) 15:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 14:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've expanded it alittle, but it is clearly notable and one of the larger of the ETFs. Racepacket (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious keep The 400+ results from Google Scholar alone[1] show that this is a very notable ETF. Not to mention 20 mentions in the Wall Street Journal just in the last three weeks.[2] First Light (talk) 23:12, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Needs some work, but does not warrant deleting. Nirvana2013 (talk) 18:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.