The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and retitle to STARFLEET Command (fan group). - Philippe 14:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

STARFLEET Command[edit]

STARFLEET Command (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unreferenced and no assertion of notability/significant third-party coverage. --EEMIV (talk) 14:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Doesn't seem very notable at all, I say delete it. I've never herd of it myself anyway, though I'm not into star trek...--Jaeger123 (talk) 14:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's the kind of topic that could be notable if there were reliable sources for it, but the lack of them in the article (and in a cursory search by me) suggests to me that this is not a notable organization. ~ mazca ^talk 16:25, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, does not seem worthy of note and can confuse links to Starfleet#Starfleet Command, which discusses starfleet command in the Star Trek series. Wiz9999 (talk) 23:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• I'd say keep. The claim that it was started in 1974 appears to be true. Check out this search, and some of the results there-in. Notable enough for me. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther! (contribs) 00:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - if kept, the article needs to be retitled to something like STARFLEET Command (fan group) because there is already an existing redirect called Starfleet Command which in turn leads to Starfleet. 23skidoo (talk) 14:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with you, there. It certainly needs a new name, if kept. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 10:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Some coverage in reliable secondary sources (see [1]) sufficient for notability concerns, I strongly agree that the article needs to be retitled as per 23skidoo. - Dravecky (talk) 01:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep but retitle I believe that enough has been said. It is notable enough as it on the first page of Google when you search "Starfleet Command" but on the present article name it will hardly be found as it is too similar to Starfleet#Starfleet Command. Jhfireboy Talk 20:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Coatrack article's primary purpose is to present a list of the fan club's presidents. No independent sources cited as of this posting. Delete but leave open the possibility of an unbiased, well-sourced article of the club (instead of its officers) that demonstrates compliance with WP:ORG. B.Wind (talk) 03:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.