The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sabrina (American singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable singer with only an internet-release single. Fails both general notability requirements at WP:BIO as well as WP:MUSIC. The article was extremely promotional and has been cleaned up but she still is not notable. Drawn Some (talk) 04:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Marginally notable person. The coverage is sufficient, however. --Vejvančický (talk) 07:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may be mistaking articles about the Greek, Portuguese, or Italian singers that also go by the single name "Sabrina" for articles about this particular Sabrina. Drawn Some (talk) 07:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the links I've added refers to the topic of this AfD. It was a bit confusing, I admit. Check the article, please. --Vejvančický (talk) 07:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neither Associated Content nor PRLog are reliable sources. As you noted, the PRLog article is a press release and anyone can submit articles to Associated Content, they pay per 1,000 views. Drawn Some (talk) 07:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, none of them are reliable nor significant. --neon white talk 12:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. --neon white talk 12:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The only claim of notability is featuring on a single by a grammy nominated artist. Whilst grammy nominated artists are notable (Wikipedia:MUSIC#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles) I don't think that featuring on one single with them is enough for inclusion. The other references just detail that she has interviewed various people - nothing else meets the criteria linked at wp:music. The main contributor may also have a conflict of interest (discussed here) which would explain why this article has been created in the first place. Smartse (talk) 14:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Insufficient sources, no chart singles. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

comment - you are apparently right, people.... I'm always trying to save the articles, but this is not encyclopedic, I agree. When I'm looking at a nice photo, I'm sometimes not encyclopedic :) ayayay... ( Sorry for wasting your time). --Vejvančický (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you've changed your mind, you should probably change your vote above so as to not potentially confuse the closing admin. DreamGuy (talk) 15:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's good not to have universal agreement or there is no true discussion and things can be overlooked. I have secretly played devil's advocate in a few of these discussions. Drawn Some (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete She does not conventionally meet the criteria at WP:MUSIC. For example, she's just about to release her first CD, while WP:MUSIC wants multiple CDs on a major label. No national tours or awards. EdJohnston (talk) 19:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I was able to find more information on her and I added it to the article. I believe she is notable enough to qualify for WP:MUSIC. --Jklein212 (talk) 05:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You added information about a promo single, that doesn't make her notable. The source is not reliable, either. Drawn Some (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not meet criteria at WP:MUSIC, no significant coverage in reliable sources.Crateescape101 (talk) 12:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Kinds of claims made on page even if accurate don't make her notable. The sources on the article fail WP:RS quite dramatically (Associated Content = any person off the street can upload any article with no editorial oversight, promotional/marketing site, press release is not an independent source, etc.). DreamGuy (talk) 15:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:MUSIC - no significant coverage in reliable sources ukexpat (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.