The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. RL0919 (talk) 00:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Muqtadir[edit]

Salman Muqtadir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Youtuber. Didn’t received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. All of sources are interview (primary) or passing mentions and also promotional. Fails WP:GNG. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 05:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed with you. Hrksmp (talk) 09:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, some celebrity coverage in RS, I think there's enough for a notability !vote [1], [2] and [3] Oaktree b (talk) 13:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: WP:DAILYSTAR in relation to 3rd link. DhakaTribune articles demonstrate notability though. Jack4576 (talk) 14:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Not enough sources to support notability. Sources found are very weak. Don’t Get Hope And Give Up — Preceding undated comment added 08:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete - only references are social media or local news media from Dhaka. Willing to change my mind with more, contradicting evidence. Bearian (talk) 17:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• keep - Has persistent coverage in national media enough to pass notability guidelines. More sources are available, and the article should be expanded and improved. Deletion is not clean-up.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:32, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep articles from Dhaka Tribune from Oaktree b pursuade me as to notability. Jack4576 (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Some of the cited sources seems sufficient in establishing notability. But the article certainly needs more improvement, since none of the sources supported the claims on his participation in dramas and enrollment in North South University. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 05:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.