The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I see a consensus to Delete this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sana Raees Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Close to 20 sources are routine coverage from the Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 17 show which is typical for all contestants. She was eliminated on Day 55 and did not play a significant role WP:BLP1E. The remaining sources are passing mentions from the cases she was handling. Fails GNG Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, India, and Maharashtra. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep:Hello @Jeraxmoira, She is not only known for Bigg Boss but also for her high profile cases and she was in BB House for 55 days and had lots of controversies which kept her in significant role till she was in Biggboss house., Notability doesnot mean how many days you spend in bigboss house but how notable you were in those days matter and references for same are as follows: ^[1][2][3][4]

  The article also has references for the high profile cases she handled like Sheena Bora murder case, Aryan Khan Drug case and following are few references which can prove the notability : ^{[5][6][7][8][9]}

  She is also seen in major role in the web-series titled The Indrani Mukerjea Story: Buried Truth.^[10][11]

  Points to consider : She is been known for the High profile cases and then she was called for BiggBoss and then while in biggboss she was in many controversies and was notable by almost all reliable sources. SAN2221 (talk) 06:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Source 5 is a paid article authored by Bizz Impact.
  • Source 6 is a video from Big boss.
  • 7 is unreliable.
  • 8 Big boss.
  • 9 Big boss.
  • 10 and 11 - are routine announcements from the docu - series and Pinkvilla's gossip section is unreliable.

  All sources related to Big Boss count as one. The high-profile cases she has handled were only covered with Sana as the primary subject after she entered Big Boss, whereas previously, the coverage of her was only a passing mention on those cases. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Check following references as proof and considering notability:

  [1]

  [2]

  [3]

  [4]

  [5]

  [6] SAN2221 (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello @Jeraxmoira, Kindly reconsider and review the references given above. SAN2221 (talk) 09:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  There is nothing to reconsider as whatever you are adding are just paid articles and more Big Boss related coverage. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello @Jeraxmoira, the references are not about bigboss its about the cases. and check this latest interview of her too [7]https://www.timesnownews.com/videos/entertainment/tv/interviews/sana-raees-khan-discusses-post-bigg-boss-life-isha-samarths-breakup-bollywood-debut-and-more-video-110472213 and following reference of bar and bench is about her bigboss enterance as she is wellknown before bigboss too. [8]https://www.barandbench.com/news/advocate-sana-raees-khan-contestant-reality-show-bigg-boss.

  If she has so many news articles covering her with few reliable sources, that means she is notable enuff to pass [GNG] and to be on wikipedia. SAN2221 (talk) 18:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A contestant on Bigg Boss show does not make the subject notable and neither any of her high profile cases have any significant coverage in the reliable sources. The subject is not well known who had any significant achievements, incidents or an allegation (even if negative) worthy of notice or relevant to warrant a page on her. RangersRus (talk) 12:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Check following references as proof and considering notability and reconsider your views:

  [9]

  [10]

  [11]

  [12]

  [13]

  [14] SAN2221 (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello @RangersRus, Kindly reconsider and review the references given above. SAN2221 (talk) 09:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Being a member of the Women in Red Movement, I always try to improve the articles related to women, increase the number of women's articles on Wikipedia. But unfortunately, at this time this article is not passing WP:GNG. good luck! Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 16:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Check following references as proof and considering notability and reconsider your views:

  [15]

  [16]

  [17]

  [18]

  [19]

  [20] SAN2221 (talk) 18:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello @Youknowwhoistheman, Kindly reconsider and review the references given above. SAN2221 (talk) 09:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Those are PROMO, trivial coverage or non-RS. Working as a lawyer isn't notable either. Oaktree b (talk) 14:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 05:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Sources are all about the tv show, not about this person, I don' see any we can use. delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom sources are about the show rather than the subject.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.