The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Opinion is split as to how WP:BLP1E and WP:BLPCRIME should apply in this case. Deryck C. 17:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay Shah (businessman) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS, WP:BLP1E, WP:BLPCRIME. I did find a couple sources Chicago Tribune, WSJ that talk about him, but not seeing enough on to pass GNG, apart from the Danish coverage on the same event. Article contains numerous POV issues as well. Based on talk, editor recreated this page. Jppcap (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 19:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now at best as there's hardly much to suggest even minimally general notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - As I argued on the talk-page, a person who is suspected of frauding 0.5 % of a country’s GDP should be considered notable. Please note that though he is only a suspect, he most likely will never be convicted in a trial due to the lack of extradition agreements. There are plenty of Danish sources. Gloegg~enwiki (talk) 16:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:BLPCRIME. This is a biography of one investigation. This is a criminal biography where the alleged crime is not yet proven. The limited likelihood of a trial does not change this. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep He was already notable enough to support an article before the fraud investigation. Just for the heck of it, I checked, and sure enough, Bernie Madoff (like Shah a financier/philanthropist of long-standing notability) only got an article on Dec. 11, 2008.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per @Gene93k:. Parsley Man (talk) 05:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - As usual, I would appreciate if this were relisted again for better attention. SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.