The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G7 by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:45, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Pearce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seemed like I should be able to establish notability for this person, but I haven't been able to. The two books that had been described as "top-rated" before I edited the text get 17 and 25 Google hits respectively, so they can't be very well known. I searched for "sarah pearce" "location location location" and "sarah pearce" "save our home" and got 28 and 14 hits, respectively. Even the show Save Our Home on TVNZ itself gets only 24 hits for "save our home" tvnz, so it can't be a notable show. From all these searches, I've mustered up significant independent coverage in just one reliable source, here. So, I'd have to say she fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Largoplazo (talk) 15:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 15:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 15:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 15:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.