The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As always, I'm happy to userfy, especially if reliable sourcing appears. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 00:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Self Propelled Mine Burier

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"As of 2009 it is currently in trials"? Non-notable secret weapon that may or may not exist Orange Mike | Talk 21:36, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Probably copyvio, as the prod tag was removed by a sockpuppet of User:Ramesh vyas who was just days ago blocked indefinitely for creating numerous copyvio articles. -- œ ^™ 09:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete . The original source have very limited information and the language structure is also very diffrent except with few common words. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.150.243 (talk) 12:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.