The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Qin's Moon characters. Already merged. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:58, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shao Yu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New user started the article without citing references, probably an unreferenced article and fails WP:N. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 13:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've already added references and plan to add more. PLease don't delete492star (talk) 21:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear if this is a reliable source or not. Assuming it is, this article still does not meet guidelines for inclusion as there is not significant coverage in 3rd party sources. --RadioFan (talk) 20:57, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The synopsis was made by the Chinese creators. It provides SIGNIFICANT coverage. Is it okay now? Also, the name in the translation for Shao Yu is Siu Yu492star (talk) 05:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unfortunately this reference doesn't help establish notability as it is a primary source. Sources written by the creator of these characters are fine as references but they dont tell us anything about how notable the subject is. Other people writing about the subject does establish notability.--RadioFan (talk) 12:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it worked. I think.. since I've never merged before..492star (talk) 23:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, List of Characters of Qin's moon's page is done. Go to the main page and then there's a link. all the character's short bios and links to their own articles are there.492star (talk) 03:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

do you think its okay now?492star (talk) 18:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.