The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Shenzhou program. (non-admin closure) — Yash ^talk stalk 03:15, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shenzhou 12[edit]

Shenzhou 12 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be WP:CRYSTALBALL. The only source seems to contain speculations and statements. I am not seeing any significant coverage in reliable sources, nor any reliable sources to even verify the information present. In addition, the Chinese wikipedia doesn't seem to have this article as well zh:神舟十二号. I would prefer to delete this article as it is WP:TOOSOON at this time. No prejudice to recreation, once reliable sources actually emerge. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Shenzhou program (with no prejudice against deletion either). WP:CRYSTAL is the main reason why this wouldn't have standalone notability in addition to lack of a sources due to being a future event. The coverage on the Shenzhou program page is more than enough for a future event for now. Kingofaces43 (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The content is not useful and speculation. I would say go ahead and delete it and perhaps salt it as well. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:03, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per WP:ATD-R to Shenzhou program § Future missions for now, which has some content about this there. Also a valid search term. This has received some coverage, but not finding enough to qualify a standalone article at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.