The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Épée#Description. I was actually going to comment but after a detailed search at Google News and Books, I only found this fencing guide which supports the 1.5 mm and 0.5 mm information that is included at Épée's description. Considering this seems to be a minor piece of fencing, the consensus is probably clear here. SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shim (fencing)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable in any way, also has no sources. ReformedArsenal (talk) 13:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Épée. That article already has a better explanation of what a shim is for. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:19, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or I will grudgingly go with a redirect, but there is nothing to merge. -- Whpq (talk) 15:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:12, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:15, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.