The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was closed as keep per the nominator being a confirmed sockpuppet. The AFD was also heading towards a keep anyways. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:33, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Siobhan Magnus[edit]

The article does not adhere to WP:MUSIC. Notability is not inherited just because of and AI appearence {WP:NOTINHERITED) be it because of the tabloid media frenzy (WP:INTHENEWS) or because lots of US citizens watch the show (WP:BIGNUMBER/WP:LOCALFAME) Supertart (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Passes criteria #9 of WP:MUSIC. The article simply needs a few reliable sources. I find it surprising that a brand new user knows how to write AfDs and using a bunch of Wikipedia lawyering links and it seems the user made no effort to find any reliable sources before placing the AfD and made no effort to contact editors of the AfD. Why do we have to go through the same year with the same results that the articles are kept for the finalists like the Wikipedia:WikiProject Idol series suggests? Aspects (talk) 23:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because a WikiProject holds no weight at AFD and consensus can change (WP:CCC). Do not bad-mouth me as an editor as I have taken the time to read policies and guidlines (unlike others). Supertart (talk) 01:23, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per above. What concerns me is that you immediately nominate the articles for deletion without doing anything else on this project. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Stub/start-class articles are allowed on Wikipedia if it's written decently and their are reliable resources. The article is just beginning to be written and I fixed the article to be decent, because before my edits it would of met AfD policies, but now it doesn't. ATC ^{. Talk} 02:32, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Its enough for now. Also, its generally my opinion that AfD nominations of major TV show contestants fare better and suffer less drama and distractions if you wait until the show is over.--Milowent (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to American Idol (season 9). This is a WP:BLP1E. There is no indication that this (or any other American Idol contestant) will be able to parlay this appearance into a sustainable career that would prove notable. -- Whpq (talk) 14:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Passes criteria #9 of WP:MUSIC. Raggedyland (talk) 03:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Passes criteria #12 of WP:MUSIC. Not continuously, but Fox has spent more than half an hour discussing Siobhan's life during American Idol. Besides, I searched for her in Wikipedia because I was curious about her life, since she's one of the favorites now. I can't be the only one, considering that she probably gets 1 million call-in votes per week. As a show favorite, she's just about guaranteed to put out an album by the end of the year, win or lose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Priorart (talk • contribs) 13:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.