The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 03:02, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Smash David (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've attempted to clean up this article, however, it fails WP:BIO, with little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Most sources cited are one line mentions. Also, several of the sources which had been added to the article, and which I removed in the clean up, were just padding; with no mention of Smash David in the cited articles. The large table entitled "Production discography" is lacking in reliable sources. Completely fails WP:MUSICBIO. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 19:30, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 19:30, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 19:30, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Which work charted? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.billboard.com/biz/search/charts?f[0]=ts_chart_artistname%3AKhalid&f[1]=ss_bb_type%3Achart_item&type=2&artist=Khalid

http://www.billboard.com/biz/search/charts?f[0]=ts_chart_artistname%3AKid%20Ink&f[1]=ss_chart_search_title%3A%2ANasty%2A&f[2]=ss_bb_type%3Achart_item&type=1&artist=Kid%20Ink&title=Nasty

http://www.billboard.com/biz/search/charts?f[0]=ts_chart_artistname%3AZoey%20Dollaz&f[1]=ss_bb_type%3Achart_item&type=2&artist=Zoey%20Dollaz

http://www.billboard.com/biz/search/charts?f[0]=ts_chart_artistname%3ADeJ%20Loaf&f[1]=ss_chart_search_title%3A%2A%23AndSeeThatsTheThing%2A&f[2]=ss_bb_type%3Achart_item&type=1&artist=DeJ%20Loaf&title=%23AndSeeThatsTheThing

Thank you. Xboxmanwar (talk) 21:51, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

None of the links mention David Smash. A search for David smash on Billboard brings back nothing. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Magnolia677 - First of all, his name is Smash David, not David Smash, and second of all, have some common sense, I was listing the sources of the singles he composed/written/record produced, in response to Atlantic306, since he didn't list the sources, if you want to see his credits for all those listed singles above, well here you go:
There's all the proof you need, also, on the the Been On My Grind link I have provided above, you will see his real full name, since you need it for proof on his name. Thank you. Xboxmanwar (talk) 14:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 01:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Davey2010 Can you explain how this article fails those two guidelines please? Also NMUSIC isn't even a guideline. Thanks. Xboxmanwar (talk) 23:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Note to Xboxmanwar. No one is challenging that Smash David has credits on a number of tracks and/or artists that meet notability requirements. You have adequately provided links that confirm that. The point you are apparently missing is the wording in WP guidelines: "May be notable if..." The key word is "may..." This means that to simply meet the criteria is a start, but not an automatic qualifier. The weakness in this article is the absence of independent, third party evidence that explains why Smash David's credits contribute to the notability of these recordings and/or artists. If such references exists, please provide it. I voted Delete earlier but would change it if you provided proof from reliable, non-trivial sources. In absence of that all that is left is your assertion that Smash David deserves a wikipedia article based on two flaws: because he exists (see WP:EDPN) and because he is associated with wiki notability (see WP:INHERITED.) ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.