The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. My count is two deletes (including poster), three keeps (four of which combined into one, and the other keeps by Paul Erik and Renaissancee). It's been relisted once, and therefore closed as no consensus. Nja²⁴⁷ 08:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Snob Scrilla

[edit]

Non-notable singer-songwriter. The references in the article are not to reliable sources (required by WP:BAND. A Google news archive search (all dates) provides no non-trivial coverage (although the name does hit some reliable sources). Bongo matic 15:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No signs of notability yet. Looks like he's just getting going. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete. Meets the folowing criteria; 1 (MTV, Youtube, Record Stores, Rolling Stone etc), 2 iTunes Australia Hip-Hop Chart @ #3, 4, was the supporting/opening act for Faker's 2008 Tour. He is compliant with more than one which all you need is one, and he meets more than one, the references are there . - Holeshot07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Holeshot07 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord ² 09:21, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Seems to have just enough coverage to pass. I would not be against revisiting this if, in 6 months' time nothing else seems to have developed (while the iTunes chart doesn't count, it is an indicator that the song could well end up on a "real" chart, and the song just came out). TheJazzDalek (talk) 14:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In Line With Guidelines. It may seem weak to allot of people, and there is no way for me to prove this, but he is popular in Australia, just the other day he was played on Nova(Radio Station), you will see more and more and more of him, this guy is not trying to get popular on wikipedia, he is allready signed and selling music, performing and so on, this is so people can gather more information about him, hence an encyclopedia, it complys with the wikipedia guidelines, as far as I know that it, there is no, in between, either you comply which he does on more than 1 criteria, or you dont, leave the page - Holeshot07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Holeshot07 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

— 211.27.22.30 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 03:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep User passes WP:MUSIC And to the posts here he is quite popular down in Australia, and has had multiple hits. Renaissancee (talk) 22:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No suggestion of hits in the article. Can you provide details? Bongo matic 22:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete. He's really taking off and I think there's quite a lot of curiosity about him being an American MC in Australia. I for one came to Wikipedia looking for more information on him (re-located by holeshot07as user must of forgotten to place it below).--211.27.22.30 (talk) 06:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC) — 211.27.22.30 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Complies with Guidelines. This has gone on long enough, blind freddy can see its inline with wikipedia guidelines, if the precious "elders" of wikipedia would open their eyes and stop pulling rank and let this pass through, time to take off the tag on the page. It complies, end of story.- Holeshot07
I added a couple of references. His co-writing of the song "Running Back", which apparently went double-platinum and hit #3 on the charts, does confer some notability based on sources. I'd lean towards keep. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.