The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Social immunity. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Social Immunity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to duplicate Social immunity Rathfelder (talk) 15:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge all the content to Social immunity. Let an interested editor straighten it out. Social Immunity is not a proper noun. Don't even bother with a REDIRECT, just delete it. Rhadow (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 16:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Social immunity, which provides more detailed coverage supported by more citations. However, the current article contains some material not covered there, so a careful merger with restructuring will be required. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge I know how the filing editor(s) must feel. scope_creep (talk) 10:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.