- Socialist Workers Thailand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article fails to meet our standards for notability, verifiability, and neutrality, with much of the content lacking reliable sources, containing original research, and exhibiting potential bias, making it unsuitable for inclusion. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 08:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Thailand. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 08:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The sources are WordPress blogs, and the article does not cite a single reliable source. Hence, it fails GNG, ORG, and other criteria. GrabUp - Talk 08:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing my vote to Keep per Goldsztajn. GrabUp - Talk 15:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Previous AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workers Democracy Group, where the result was to redirect. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:NEXIST, AfD is not cleanup. Was originally started by Giles Ungpakorn, notable exile Thai leftist. Its activities are covered in the Thai press; some examples: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 11:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: If kept, should be histmerged with Workers Democracy Group and rolled back to a non-blatantly-soapboxing version. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to clarify, given WDG is the forerunner, would suggest hist merge to SWT, rather than merge to WDG. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 01:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that's what I meant as well. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per Goldsztajn. There are more sources out there but a lot of them do seem fairly routine, but not significantly enough to delete in my opinion. C F A 💬 18:16, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]