The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Smash[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:PROD. The article lacks secondary reliable sources to satisfy the WP:GNG. A quick WP:BEFORE yields no reviews, which is unfortunately strongly suggestive of non-notability. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 00:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 00:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:GNG. There's some game guide stuff out there, [1] [2] [3], but like a lot of mobile games, it suffers from the problem that mobile games aren't extensively reviewed. ~ A412 ^talk! 01:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG, no sources are RS nor count towards notability. Only non-primary source lists no author, holds no significant coverage, and is not an RS. There exist some (read: minimal, scant) possible sources online, but ultimately these are guides and walk-throughs rather than significant coverage. WhoAteMyButter (🌷_talk│🌻^contribs) 01:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : As per above conclusion.Shah Of Nowhere (talk) 18:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG in a big way. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with everyone here as it does fail WP:GNG. Don't even get me started on the reception. MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 05:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best I could find: Unity case study, hardcoredroid.com (uncertain reliability) IgelRM (talk) 12:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Solar Smash is a really popular game, and this article needs to be fixed, but I do not think it should be deleted in my opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arhan D (talk • contribs) 04:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arhan, you may like to take a look at the general notability guideline, and particularly rebuttals against something being popular making an article notable to understand the issues raised in this discussion. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 05:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.