The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
merge as usual -- or at least as ought to be usual. These separate articles should never have been made in the first place, but a merge will deal with them. No argument given against a merge,. WP:Deletion policy requires considering such alternatives to deletion before coming here. DGG ( talk ) 23:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think nominating this many similar articles at a time is disruptive in effect--I doubt very much the nom made a thorough search for reviews, and therefore checking these for possible notability as a single article would require such a search. A few at a time is the most that can be handled. We are seeing a directed deletion campaign agains electronic product articles, at too high a speed for meaningful response. AGF, I don't think the intent was to prevent proper discussion, but such is the effect. DGG ( talk ) 23:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Delete per WP:PRODUCT. This is one of hundreds of thousands of products which should not have articles on WP. We are in URGENT need of a prescriptive notability guideline for products. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.