The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by DGG under criteria WP:A7 and WP:G11. (non-admin closure) /wiae /tlk 22:41, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spear Alliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article written by a single-purpose account about a firm that does not meet the corporate notability criteria. There are simply no high-quality references discussing the firm at all.

My WP:BEFORE search did not turn up any reliable, independent sources of information with in-depth coverage of Spear Alliance. (I used Google, Google News, Google Newspaper Archive, Google Books, JSTOR, Bing and Highbeam. I also briefly searched using the company's former name, "HKO Consulting".) As a result, the subject fails to satisfy WP:CORP or WP:GNG. /wiae /tlk 02:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 02:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 02:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.