The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mz7 (talk) 06:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spirit of Capricorn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was created in April. No valid source has been included. It is already included on the article of InterCity Express (Queensland Rail). I see no reason that it should have its own page. Reb1981 (talk) 02:06, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This article is about a service; InterCity Express (Queensland Rail) is about the rolling stock which operated that service. They're different topics and it makes sense to have different articles. Mackensen (talk) 13:11, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:51, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:55, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep I can verify the service ran from Brisbane to Rockhampton [1] but nothing else. The notability guidelines for train routes are only just above existence; perhaps @Tdhla1: can comment as-to how they wrote the article. I'm not opposed to a merge in principle, but I don't feel InterCity Express (Queensland Rail) is a good target. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:52, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.