The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy-deletion (A7, G11). (Non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 06:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Steeltailor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been speedily deleted four times, most recently today, on the grounds of promotion or non-notability. Can we get a final declaration of this finding, and perhaps salt the article? —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:03, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete and salt - the same content has been pasted onto the user page of the article's creator - User:Slinna87 - which I will tag for speedy deletion. Stalwart111 03:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt. It looks like this has been an attempt by a user to constantly re-add the article. I've deleted the userpage version and nominated the mainspace copy, so putting that out there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there have been other account names so I'll be opening a SPI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.