The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 10:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Story of O - Chapter 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not deserve its own article, I say redirect to Story of O Sports Devotee (talk) 10:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Dear, can you explain your opposition to the article please? The film article has proper references to be published and respect Wikipedia guidelines. --Mateouso (talk) 10:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The missing Due diligence:

Original:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spain:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Finland:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

French:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Greece:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

English 1:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

English 2:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Germany:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dutch:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Keep per meeting WP:NF per WP:GNG. In light of the article's numerous sources, to simply state unequivocally "Does not deserve its own article" kind of make this AFD a little confusing. WP:NF is WP:NF. Just sayin'. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 17:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and close nomination. Clearly a troll nomination if he's not going to explain the sourcing problems editorEهեইдအ😎 03:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I have added even more references to reliable sources and the notability guideline for films is met. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.