The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of fatal coyote and wolf attacks in Canada. (non-admin closure) Music1201 talk 21:45, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sturgeon River wolf attacks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence for significance. DGG ( talk ) 00:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As noted in response to the other times you've floated this argument: Taylor Mitchell does not have a Wikipedia article because coyotes; she has a Wikipedia article because she was a musician who had already passed WP:NMUSIC while she was still alive. And Kenton Carnegie cites 36 reliable sources which demonstrate enduring impacts — while this article cites just one reference, and provides no context by which the incident could be notable for more than just the fact that it happened. Every wolf or coyote attack that happens at all is not automatically a valid topic for a standalone article; it takes something more, such as enduring significance or a victim who was already notable anyway, to make it appropriate for inclusion. Bearcat (talk) 20:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Don't lie to people, I never "floated" this argument before, as this is a new article started this week. I have never spoken to you before and I do not know you. IQ125 (talk) 21:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Er, you floated this argument on three other AFD discussions in the past two days alone. Bearcat (talk) 13:48, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.