The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — The Earwig talk 01:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Su Changlan[edit]

Su Changlan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks independent sources. Fails in passing WP:GNG Setreis (talk) 13:20, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Setreis (talk) 13:20, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 13:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 14:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

((More citations needed)). –Cupper52Discuss! 16:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may not vote twice on this. STSC (talk) 06:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my bad. I honestly forgot that I had voted on this. My brain wasn't working, I guess. LeBron4 (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.