The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was IAR speedy close; this isn't a productive way to start and AFD or resolve the issues. Talk page is thataway... (no prejudice against future renomination under normal procedures) --Errant ^(chat!) 14:22, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suicide methods[edit]

Suicide methods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't support this article's deletion, but I am creating this nomination on the behalf of User:MarcusBritish who seems to think this article should be deleted for its supposedly unencyclopedic nature; since we disagree as to what the consensus is, I thought that we should refer the matter to consensus again, so as to settle the animosity between us. User:MarcusBritish will give a clearer argument for its deletion. elle _{vécut heureuse} ^{à jamais} (be free) 13:53, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep – sorry, I did not approve or request this. Editor should not have opened AfD in my name, which is uncivil behaviour whilst the issue is being discussed on AN/I. This is merely a tactic to avoid facing issues the article may have, but does not wish to discuss. Closing Admin please warn nominator against this behaviour, and not to use AfD in this fashion, or other people's names. Ma®©usBritish ^{[Chat • RFF]} 14:05, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete on the issues that MarcusBritish has pointed out. elle _{vécut heureuse} ^{à jamais} (be free) 14:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Marcus hasn't raised issues for deletion, but for a rewrite, which are ideas not final drafts. You are acting in bad faith. I will not be giving any reasons. You opened the thing, you explain yourself. Ma®©usBritish ^{[Chat • RFF]} 14:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I think this AfD should be closed right now and the editor warned for inappropriate behavior. The article may be problematic but a 7th AfD isn't the place to discuss this. — Jean Calleo ^(talk) 14:12, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Ma®©usBritish ^{[Chat • RFF]} 14:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.